Best Practices and Standards

PDF version

 

 

 

Best Practices Among Microfinance Practitioners

Best Practices Among Supporting Organisations

   Standards

Best Practices Among Funding Organisations Sources


Research findings in Pakistan show programs that have pursued financial sustainability have achieved far greater outreach than programs that have provided subsidized credit and relied on continuing donor support to make up the remaining losses. 

 

There are currently three primary methodologies followed in Pakistan; first the community-based methodology (used by Rural Support Programs), the Grameen/solidarity group model and a hybrid mixing individual lending and community-based methodology.  A number of international best practices are applied in Pakistan including:

 

 

Best Practices Among Microfinance Practitioners

 

Among microfinance providers, Kashf Foundation was the first to implement international best practices by choosing to focus only on microfinance, serving in priority women and by seeking financial sustainability. Its success has been confirmed by impact studies revealing that 85% of Kashf clients have recorded an increase of income, while 67% have recorded an improvement in the household diet.

 

Kashf Foundation has also ensured that its institutional development is geared towards sustainability by imposing high performance standards in terms of productivity (600 clients per loan officer, branch offices serving 1,800 to 2,400 clients) and costs control (sustainability of each branch within two years, control of operating expenses, streamlined cash management systems).

 

During its learning experience in microfinance, the Bank of Khyber has identified a series of successful practices:

 

The Urban Poverty Alleviation Program (UPAP), part of the NRSP, has placed significant focus on the timely and efficient recovery of loans. With a recovery rate of approximately 99%, UPAP is sustainable, keeping its cost down through low profile settlement offices and its closeness to clients.

   

 

 

Best Practices Among Supporting Organisations

 

The Pakistan Microfinance Network publishes a Performance Indicators Report (PIR) bi-annually, with the aim of improving the transparency and efficiency within the microfinance sector in Pakistan. Started in 1999, the PIR includes indicators on sustainability, efficiency, portfolio quality and savings mobilisation. It also provides a sector overview and an analysis of the performance of individual members.

 

The PIR set industry benchmarks in Pakistan, while promoting self-regulation and credibility within the microfinance industry. As reported by PMN, PIR has been instrumental in changes in the Pakistani microfinance industry, for example in separating microfinance from other development activities, promoting delinquency management and allowing individual members to compare their performance over time and against peers. PMN has established close links with the Microbanking Bulletin (MBB) in setting indicators and defining and calculating ratios.

 

Unfortunately, most of the capacity and products of microfinance organizations are geared towards the provision of microcredit rather than microfinance, as defined as the full range of financial services such as savings, insurance and others.

 

 

Standards

 

The Pakistan Microfinance Network has pioneered the push for a standardized representation of financial and operational data among MFIs in Pakistan. Its Performance Indicators Report remains the most accurate and comprehensive source of information on practices and standards in Pakistan. 

Client Outreach

The largest outreach is obtained by organisations using community-based methodologies – namely Rural Support Programs and the National Rural Support Program (largest microfinance provider). However, the Grameen model has progressed rapidly in recent years and increased significantly its outreach, with the successful example of Kashf Foundation.

 

Recovery rates

The Grameen/solidarity group model maintains the highest recovery rate of any of the methodologies used in Pakistan, with a recovery rate of 99.5% as of May 2002. Two thirds of PMN members post recovery rates higher than 95%. Peer pressure and group supervision to ensure timely loan repayment appears to be the most effective practice, although, this high recovery rate could possibly be attributed to the smaller loans offered.

 

Financial and Operational Self-sufficiency

Organisations using a mixed methodology, combining individual lending and CBOs, seem to have a higher operational self-sufficiency. As of December 2002, only the NRSRP, Orangi Pilot Project and the First Microfinance Bank were financially self-sufficient (ratio above 100%).  Kashf Foundation was operationally self-sufficient.

Portfolio at Risk

Reported in mid-2002, the Grameen/solidarity group model was the only methodology for which organisations post a PAR under the 5% internationally accepted threshold. As of the end of 2002, Kahsf Foundation and the First Microfinance Bank were the best performers, with respectively PAR at 0.2% and 0%, followed by Taraqee with 2%.

 

 

Best Practices Among Funding Organisations

 

The literature suggests that donor organizations should ensure their financial support has the maximum impact possible. An emphasis is placed upon the need for extensive research on funds recipients and to ensure that the aims the MFI holds are commensurate with those of the donor.  Furthermore it is suggested that donations be made to those organizations that are operating in line with best practice, norms of the day including;

  1. Reliance on market-orientated interest rates,

  2. Emphasis on providing incentives and facilities for saving mobilisation;

  3. Commitment to achieving financial self-sustainability; and

  4. Procedures aimed at reducing transaction costs.

 

Sources

 

Pakistan National Development Report 2003, UNDP

 

Back to Top